"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"VV" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...
But no such attack happened
Did this fact make it impossible?
No bit meant it didnt become a perceived threat.
?????
Quite so but not everything possible is perceived as likely
In I believe 1994 terrorists threatened to drop an Airbus on Paris.
But no such attacked happened since the pilot made it quite
clear that he would do no such thging
Conclusions were made: Don't rely on pilots' 'cooperation', train your
owm pilots devoted to accomplish the job. And that was done, as you
know. Things in this dark world are really 'improving'.
Hindsight is wonderful
It is. What's your point here?
Using the same tool it was 'obvious' that Chechen rebels would hijack
a theatre, how come the Russian authorities failed to prevent it ?
One of several attempts may succeed. If no steps are made all of them
will. Just ask Putin. Just ask Sharon. Just ask Bush. Just ak Blair.
Just ask... The list gonna be long.
The questions are who, when, where and how.
And you'd better call them freedom fighters.
In 1995 on of prominent Chechen 'freedom-fighters' threatened the same
thing would fall upon Kremlin, publicly.
They also threatened to use nuclear weapons
They had none, it was a shallow threat. But a plane could be hijacked
and it was hijacked, namely in May 2001 a TU-154 plane was hijacked in
Turkey, but pilots locked the door and didn't let the hijackers in.
What was on their minds?
Not being hijacked
Oops I meant hijackers, not pilotes.
We've noticed
Let's note we've stopped discussing and are just exchanging
meaningless remarks.
Regards
VV
|