Reading Cindy's post, and even between its lines, I really don't see
any content that particularly defames the Puch.

Thanks.
I'm sensitive about Pooches overall, and wanted to be as fair to the
airframe
as I could be.

There is an excellent lesson here that a good PCC should also include
the axial play of control surfaces, and not just their deflection,
sense, and slop.


THAT was/is the message the pilot and I wanted to emphasize.
Thanks for the comment about AXIAL examination. I frequently see
pilots wobble surfaces about, sometimes too roughly, and VERY seldom
see someone check all surfaces for all three axes of movement. That
could perhaps have found this as a potential departure of a surface.

I was delighted to read the thread's progress tonight. Thank you to
Eric M. for the detail and thoughtfullness of his contribution. And to
JJ.
I couldn't begin to recall the fanny hardware, as the last 50-3 I knew
was over ten years ago, and only through one periodic inspection.
(Tongue bit and lips clenched. Restraint shown here.)

Thanks to many of you for defending my reputation! Ahhh, Chivalry.

And Bob W. -- the incident report wasn't YET published. ;-)
I wasn't waiting for Monday, as I only get to here intermittently.
I am glad to see it recorded, and will be curious to see what, if any
conclusions, can be drawn. I deliberately avoided any personal
conjecture,
writing only what was told to me. (Adjusting front pedals may have
masked a 'moment of change', or not.)


I did not point fingers of fault in any direction.
There are plenty of US glider "events" that never make it into any
reporting
system. I only did what was asked -- to try to have some good results
and discussions from an otherwise unsettling flight. I hope this
inspires
other pilots to POST and share things that keep each other more
aware, more conscientious and still having fun with each other in
2011.

We could all use the reminders.

Cindy
(who went wave soaring Wednesday)
www.caracole-soaring.com