"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

snip


His priorities obviously did not include retaining his flying status and
maybe
even volunteering for transition into a combat aircraft in use in Viet Nam
and
maybe even subsequently volunteering to serve in Viet Nam.

He had already volunteered for Palace Alert duty--you were informed of this
before and admitted you had never heard of the program, much less the fact
that Bush did indeed volunteer for it. Your first false claim in this regard
can be chalked up to ignorance--repeated false claims just confirms your
lack of integrity.

I suppose he thought
his Texas ANG experience uniquely qualified him to manage some unknown
Alabama
politician's election campaign, and that was his first priority.

Gee, the idea that NG personnel consider their civilian occupations as being
their normal first priority--astounding!

Then, too,
maybe the streets of Montgomery or Birmingham being far safer than the
streets
of Pleiku or Bien Hoa might have had something to do with it.

Being as he had already volunteered for Palace Alert, you are just lying
agin.


The fact remains that our shooting war was in Southeast Asia and he chose
to
walk in the opposite direction. You can call that kind of behavior
courageous,
but I can think of numerous other descriptive adjectives I might use, none
of
which would even remotely be identified with courage.

Courage would require you to admit you were wrong in posting this nonsense
the first time you did so--integrity should have kept you from repeating
this crap again after admitting you had no idea that the program existed, or
that Bush had indeed volunteered for it. Seems like you are not exhibiting
much of either quality. If you want to attack Bush on the basis of differing
opinions regarding his policies, fine, that would be your right. But
attacking him based upon your own false assertions is just plain lying, pure
and simple.

Brooks


George Z.