opined

On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:22:18 +0000, Scott
wrote:


Again? This comes up every year (or even more often). I believe the
FAA basically says we already have it (Sport Pilot) and has denied it in
the past.

I have to say I don't disagree with the logic in the proposal.
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Re...=090000648099d
311&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf

"FAA's medical exemption is currently exclusive to LSA aircraft,
artificially creating an unfair, unnecessary and exclusive market
concession for a few LSA manufacturers. FAA medical standards are
literally being exploited by industry to force thousands of older
pilots to stop using their certified aircraft; so they must either buy
a new LSA or quit flying,"

I think that is essentially true.

If it's safe enough for a pilot to fly a new $150,000 LSA with no
medical, why isn't it safe for the same pilot to fly a 25 or 30 year
old Cessna 172 or 182 or a 25 or 30 year old Piper Cherokee?

What do you think?

It is not the cost of the aircraft that is important. Bureaucrats will only
be yelled at for saying yes.


A C172 can carry 2 more people than an LSA.
A Mooney is 100Kts faster than an LSA.
A Cherokee can fly in the clouds.
A bonanza is much heavier than an LSA.

All of which can increase the chances of a crssh, the body count of a crash.
And all the non crash flights are not seen.

So, which way is a bureaucrat going to go?


-ash
Elect Cthulhu!
Vote the greater evil.