"callsignzippo" wrote in message
om...
IBM wrote in message
. ..
(Ewe n0 who) wrote in
:

The Lie Factory
By Robert Dreyfuss and Jason Vest

[meow, meow, meow... snipped]

Sadam is toast. A victim of his wish to convince
the world he had and was prepared to use. Evidently
he hadn't heard the old saw about being careful what
you wish for.
Is this a bad thing?
Ghaddafi has seen the elephant.
Is this a bad thing?
We now know the Iranians were farther along
than the intelligence suggested.
Is this a bad thing?
And the North Koreans can't be feeling all that spring
fresh about now. In short, it was worth it.

That the Democrats refuse to recognise Sept 11 2001
changed the parameters of what the US could accept in the
world shows they are utterly unfit to govern this nation.

IBM

Nonsense.
That some people refuse to accept the fact that we attacked and
currently occupy the wrong country is totally incomprehensible. 9-11
was about Afghanistan, Pakistan and militant elements in Saudi, it was
never about Saddam. Was he a son of bitch? Yes. Was HE worth going to
war over? No.

Yes, taking out Saddam was essential to withdrawing from Saudi. The US
needed to leave Saudi to cease occupying Moslem Holy Land.

As to the suggestion that al Qaeda is somehow religious, it is the
disribution of heroin that interests al Qaeda, not Allah. Selling poison to
the dead is more of a Hell's Angels service than the Religous. Saddam and
al Qaeda are secular entities, both praising Allah for the wealth it may
bring.