On Jan 3, 6:43*am, Bob Noel wrote:
In article ,

*VOR-DME wrote:
Dare we say this pilot has an ax to grind?!
Based solely on the account posted here, I would say their actions against
him
are appropriate and justified, and certainly in line with what he expected in
launching this self-serving publicity campaign.

I would guess that you don't have any experience or knowledge of
security procedures.

Anyone claiming that the videos show any sensitive security information
doesn't know the definitin of "sensitive" or "security". *Exactly what
information shown in the videos isn't already public knowledge? *Exactly
what information shown in the vidoes show procedures that provide actual
security?

The issue is, he showed shortcomings in the existing procedures. The
correct description for this pilot should be "Whistle-blower" . That
the whistle blowing called attention to shortcomings in the systems
should be greeted by the authorities with "Hey, thanks for pointing
that out", not "We're gonna get you for embarrassing us".