Quaalude wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 00:56:51 -0000, wrote:

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article ,
Quaalude wrote:
John Lear has the answer to 9/11

http://youtu.be/3jCiQVnbwfc

Can someone summarize? My guess is that it's a pilot explaining
how fire can't burn hot enough to weaken steel. The next video
will be a metalurgist explaining how it was clearly a controlled
demolition. We'll round off the series with a demolitions
expert explaining how a plane can't be piloted accurately enough
to hit a building at high speeds.

Sure; John Lear is a well known UFO and conspiracy theory kook.

It was his father Bill that built the Lear jet.

I knew his brother, who died 2 years ago. The description of John Lear
is right on!

As an engineer, I can vouch for the weakening of steel at elevated
temperatures.

As an additional note: If there really WERE a conspiracy, it would
revolve around the use of substandard steel in the construction of the
WTC. I do not know the differences in price among structural steel
grades, but, with something like 200 million tons of steel involved, the
urge to cut corners in the construction of WTC (and to pocket the
difference) would have been a huge temptation!

Nah, it is in essentially banning the use of asbestos to insulate structural
steel against the temperatures of fires.

http://youtu.be/3jCiQVnbwfc
3 min

Sorry, I don't have 3 min to waste on kook babble.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.