In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:39:28 -0500, Howard Berkowitz
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:



No. it does not. Homosexuals are not recognized in the Constitution,
and no "same sex" "marriages exit.


With the exception of voting rights for men, where did the original
Constitution say anything about sex or gender? Following your logic,
since I am quite confident the Constitution is silent on
heterosexuality, there's no Constitutional basis for marriage.

My point is that there is no recognition of homosexuality at all.

Al Minyard

Nice change of subject. It doesn't recognize sexuality of any type. By
your logic, there's no recognition of heterosexual marriage -- or any
other type of marriage.

Following your interesting logic, there's no recognition of
Klinefelter's syndrome, 5-alpha reductase deficiency with failure of
Mullerian development, prostatic cancer, ectopic pregnancy,
heterosexuality, asexuality, bisexuality, homosexuality, hyperemesis
gravidarum, gamete in-vitro transfer, the missionary position or any
other position, masturbation, androgens, mineralocorticoids, estrogens,
progestins, etc. All of these, I take it, are prohibited.