In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


Incorrectly remembering what he saw (dates, people, milieus, etc.).


He doesn't have to remember specific dates, just place him at Dannelly
within the proper time period.


Nobody said anything about specifc dates. I think year and approximate
month (or even season) would suffice. That coupled with the instances in
which the person claims to have seen Mr. Bush.

Tell me, why has nobody else in the unit come forward. I sure as well
won't ever forget those I served with both on active duty and active
reserves. Surely, more than one person can step forward.


Partisanship?


I think you've nailed it.


I probably have.


Anybody that does place him at Dannelly is
obviously a partisan and thus not a credible witness.


Your conclusion; certainly not mine



How about we start with at least two people and take it from there?


Two partisans are no more credible than one.


Nobody is accusing the person claiming to have seen Mr. Bush multiple
times of partnership. However, partisanship should be considered...when
it's only one person coming forward (months after the fact). Even if two
people wanted to play such games, their two testimonies can be played
side by side for examination and it probably wouldn't be too hard to
then credit or discredit the entire premise.



--Mike

--Mike