"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

We certainly can count on our statisticians to breath life and
interest
into any subject that catches their eye. (^-^)))

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz...snort!!! Did I miss anything? (^-^)))

Yeah, you did--a lot of typical misguided preconceived notions about
Vietnam
veterans getting blown out of the water. Burkett does an even more
admirable
job on your personal favorite, that "sworn" WSI testimony you keep
muttering
about. You have two choices here, George--go check the book out from
your
local library and give it a read, or continue to march with your
cherished
myths--which will it be?

I'll stop babbling when you stop babbling. Deal?

You are not going to risk those cherished and false notions regarding
WSI,
are you? All of that "sworn" (your term) testimony that Kerry/Walinsky
based
his/their congressional testimony on? Much easier to continue on in
blissful
ignorance, huh?

"Yes" or "No" too hard to pick from? I didn't mean to challenge you; is
it a
deal or not?

Typical George. I asked you up front whether you'd rather read an
interesting work that convincingly puts paid to your ridiculous "Kerry's
speech before Congress was based upon sworn testimony!" (which you
compounded by making that false statement not once but twice in the same
post), or whether you'd prefer to float happily along in continuing
ignorance of the truth regarding that matter. No surprise that you have
chosen the latter--perish the thought of your reading a factual account that
by happenstance (Burkett's work was not directed at a guy who was then just
another Senator from Kennedyland) casts a pall over the veracity of your new
hero's most (in)famous moment. Being afraid of reading the truth (such as
the true nature of the WSI "testimony") is one heck of an endorsement for
your candidate, George.

Brooks


George Z.