View Single Post
  #3  
Old March 9th 04, 09:50 PM
Howard Berkowitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article k.net,
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Dudley Henriques"
Date: 3/9/04 10:44 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: .net


Great stuff as usual Dudley. But even though I was forewarned I was
still
surprised to see them come in on their backs. BTW, we could tell an
experienced pilot from a novice just by how aggressive and fast he got

set and
swept in on us. The timorous would never come in inverted and always
pass

over
us as he completed his run while Bill Henderson (Pittsburgh) in the
top

turret
would track him coming an going.
Of course passing under us was the better way to go since the top
turret

had a
far greater field of action than the hand held waist guns fired by Bo

Taylor
(Texas). while on his knees. Lousy position. Clumsy way to shoot. worst

gun on
the Marauder.


One thing's for sure. Everybody learned fast or they didn't learn at all.


Seriously, would anyone care to speculate that if aircraft gunner was
still a tactically useful skill, how much virtual reality simulator time
(e.g., in at least a 3-axis-of-motion device) would a gunner get before
going to a combat unit? Aggressor simulators only, or perhaps a few
pilots that have flown the aggressor ship manipulating the target?

I suspect temperature, noise, fumes, etc. would all be part of the
simulator.