On Jun 5, 6:11*pm, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Jun 5, 1:24*pm, Andy wrote:

Can anyone comment of why Power FLARM transmit power appears to be
much less than the transmit power allowed by FCC for this class of
FHSS device? (ref test report on file with FCC)

Is this a limitation of the RF module that was selected? *Was it to
increase battery life? *Was it expected that adequate range would be
achieved with a very low power level?

Does the brick have the same transmit power as the portable?

Andy

I see what you mean.... 10mW could not possibly have been the intended
result.

Experience at 15s showed many targets out to 6 nm in all directions
except my 6:00, where range was 1.5 - 2 nm. The range problem noted
previously appears to have been solved.

-Evan Ludeman / T8

Reading other info at that site indicates that 10mW was the design
power output. Hmmmm.

-T8