View Single Post
  #15  
Old August 21st 12, 07:27 AM
Ventus_a Ventus_a is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: May 2010
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cochrane[_2_] View Post
On Aug 20, 1:09*pm, Gary Osoba wrote:[color=blue][i]

snip

Another point to remember. The new designs represent reaction to a
change in rules, not a change in technology. The open class isn't the
"open" class, it's the 850 kg class. What's happening is the design
response to 850 kg. To achieve a modern wingloading at 850 kg, you
need shorter (than 28 meters) span or shorter chord. Concordia went
one way, but in a design that could never be mass marketed. The 23 m
span seems an optimum for 850 kg, "normal" construction techniques,
and a price under a million bucks. But if there were not a weight
limit, the winning design might well look more like an Eta, cost as
much as a B2 bomber and fly at 1500 kg. And have a production run of
about two. I'm not advocating it -- for once I think the IGC did
something right, as 850 seems to be revitalizing the open class.

John Cochrane
I was exchanging emails with Michael Sommer before the worlds and he was wondering how competitive the EB29 would be at 'only' 55kg wingloading against the newer ships.

Based on his result you would have to say it was very competitve. How much of that is down to his undoubted ability is for better men than me to ponder

:-) Colin