View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 1st 12, 06:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Kimmo Hytoenen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default PowerFlarm BRICK range issues - are we alone????

Mark,

If the aerial is well installed, so that the "visibility" is equal in all
directions, I believe that 2-3 miles range is good. If someone
can see another glider from distance of 6 miles, then AFAIK the
antenna gain is strong into that direction, but weak in other
directions. In you make a directional antenna, you lost the
performance in all other directions. The antennas delivered with
FLARM are omni-directional, so the range analysis is spherical in
optimum case.

Have you used
http://www.flarm.com/support/analyze/index_en.html
to analyze the range?

-kh

At 15:56 01 October 2012, Mark wrote:
Three members at my club (self included) have installed

PowerFlarm bricks
r=
ecently. We carefully read and have complied with the

antenna separation
r=
equirements in the manual. As is stands currently, the

maximum xperienced
=
communication range (Flarm to Flarm) is about 2.2 miles and it

frequently
d=
rops out around 1.3-1.5 miles. Regarding PCAS operation, the

only alert I
=
have received using the PowerFlarm Brick has been the

towplane at a
distanc=
e of about 1000-1500 feet lateraly, same altitude. At the same

time my
Zao=
n PCAS alerted to the same towplane at a range of 2+ miles

and 1000 feet
be=
low.

The three gliders are a Ventus 1, Discus 2, and a PIK. All

three seem to
b=
e experiencing the same issues with very poor range. Emails

to FLARM have
=
seemed to fall on deaf ears. We're curious if we're the only

ones or if
ot=
hers are also seeing the same issues with BRICKS. We've

heard plenty from
=
portable users who are reporting 6+ miles Flarm to Flarm and

PCAS alerts
ap=
proaching 5 miles. If changes to the installation will fix this,

great!
W=
e just need to know what to change. The US dealer has seen

pics of our
ins=
tallation and says the antenna installations look good. They

are all on
th=
e top of the glare shields so should be excellent visibility. We'd

like
th=
is to work, but if there is no option to improve the performance

then
sendi=
ng the stuff back is certainly on the table. More testing this

weekend,
bu=
t at the moment it's not looking good.