View Single Post
  #7  
Old March 22nd 04, 03:49 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dav1936531" wrote in message
...
From: (BUFDRVR)


There were reports some years ago (never confirmed AFAIK) of Soviet

suitcase
nukes having disappeared from their inventory.

What "inventory"? I've seen several reports where both ex-Soviet nuclear

scientists and ex-Soviet military officials repeatedly claim there were

never
any suitcase nukes in the first place. This turn coat Ledbed (is that his
name?) seems to have been rewarded hansomely for scaring the crap out of
western nations.
BUFDRVR


We had/have "suitcase" nuke demolition charges.....it seems only fair to

assume
that the Soviets had/have them too.


Big suitcase. SADM, with its W-54 warhead, was not something you could drop
into your American Tourister and waltz into some hotel with it. Did the
Soviets have small ADM's? We don't really know--Lebed's claims have been
pretty much discredited, though, so if that is what you (or the originator
of this "news" story) are basing this on, it is not much.


If they have lost control of them, denying they ever existed would be a

good
way to attempt to save face and to try to avoid any liability for

negligent
management of their armaments should the new owners use one in a terror

attack.

If AQ had them for some time, they'd have used them by now. And would not
have been wasting their time trying to foment "dirty bomb" plots. AFAIK, the
smallest Soviet device would have been a 152mm warhead for artillery
use--but that would undoubtedly have been a gun-type or linear implosion
device, so it would be kind of long, not to mention heavy (more than 100
pounds IIRC based upon US 155mm warheads)--and of a rather small yield.
Color me (very) dubious on this whole "suitcase nukes are lying around
everywhere" hysteria that periodically arises (this ain't the first time).

Brooks


Let's hope Al-Qaeda is blowing smoke.
Dave