View Single Post
  #53  
Old March 24th 04, 12:48 AM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Peter Stickney) wrote in
news
In article ,
"Kevin Brooks" writes:

What's the range of a 105 RR ?


Well, the Davey Crockett wasn't a 105 RCL. It came in 2 flavors - a
120mm bore tube with a range band of between 300m and 200m, and a
155mm tube with a range band of between 200m and 4000m.
Warhead yield was dialable in a range of 20t to 250t. (.02 KT - ,25
KT). (It was a muzzleloader, btw)


Of course it was an artist's sketch.

The same artists are now working on sketches of nuc bunker busters.
Another bad idea IMHO.


And a very old idea. The first nuclear penetrating bomb was the Navy's
Mk 8, from teh very early 1950s.

You are referring to the Davey Crockett, which was indeed fielded. It
used the W-54 warhead, the smallest spherical implosion device ever
fielded by the US, mounted on what was basically a "spigot" which was
inserted into the tube, with the warhead being that bulbous bomb-like
contraption sticking out of the end. The same warhead was the basis
for the SADM.


Yeah, Basically, it was an Atomic Bottle Rocket. It was technically
feasible, but when you consider that it was still a Nuke, with all the
security, accountability, and authorization requirements that a Great
Big Nuke has, I don't think any of the very few Infantry units that
got them really liked teh idea. After all, what's the point of a
Jeep-portable Atomic Gun when you need another Jeep and trailer to
hold all the paperwork?


And don't forget the Guard detachment.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net