In article ,
"Paul J. Adam" wrote:

In message , Chad Irby
writes
In article ,
"Paul J. Adam" wrote:
Cuts both ways. Remember all those stories about how Saddam used to feed
victims feet-first through an industrial shredder?

Actually, this is cutting the *same* way.

Okay, you're happy on a diet of lies: not everyone is as joyful about
being misled as you. You're telling me that you *like* being misled? Or
are you just wholly reckless as to the truth?

That's really how I perceive most of the left as of now. They're so
busy trying to find "lies!" that they can't allow for any normal human
mistakes... and will forgive Hussein's *thousands* of murders because
someone said something that someone can't prove.

Again, there's plentiful truth about Saddam, so why bother making stuff
up?

Because, at the time, these *were* the stories we were getting out of
Iraq. This is what the Iraqis were *telling* us, through the msaaive
laters of insane lies coming out of there.

Of course, you're certain that the Great Bush and Company Conspiracy
made this all up, just to deceive *you* into supporting a war when you
wouldn't go in for any of the other hundred reasons, like torture,
murder, rape, and worse. And - here's the nasty part - the plastic
shredder wasn't even as bad as the *proven* events (note also that the
"no shredder" story didn't really do anything except show that the
writer didn't find anything, not that they found a disproof of it).

But *you* are so concerned with trying to find the Big Lie that you
don't care about the hundreds of medium-sized Ugly Truths.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.