View Single Post
  #54  
Old November 20th 03, 01:03 AM
Dave Hyde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay wrote:

Okay, thanks for all that, I think you're missing some parentheses in
there because I'm getting a quad decker formula.


The formula is correct as written.

So with this theoretical wing of aspect approaching zero,
2 non-interfering wings of half span, would be essentially the
same lift and drag as one.


I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the basics here.
An infinte (span) wing has an aspect ratio of INFINITY, not zero.
LARGER aspect ratio is less drag.
Again, to make a successful break from the mouse-maze, you've
either got to have a sound grasp of the fundamentals or be
very lucky. Counting on luck does not instill confidence
(but sometimes produces interesting threads).

Most if not all of those X planes were R&D payed for by the you and
me, the tax payers of America. Its extremely rare for a large company
to take a "flyer" with their own money and reach very far forward.


Who pays is irrelevant. There have been and will continue to
be radical departures from the 'box' even by giants in the aerospace
industry. The simple fact that you are not aware of them does not
mean that they do not exist.

Dave 'to infinity...and beyond' Hyde