View Single Post
  #9  
Old April 17th 04, 07:48 PM
copprtopkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 04:14:26 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:



wrote in message
news
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:20:36 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:

FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC. FAA
Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during the intercept. If I am
incorrect about this please post specific FAA Procedures that shows

this.
It
shouldn't be that difficult. Then again for you, it may.

So if there is no requirement to scramble aircraft, then how would
following nonexistent procedures have saved the day on 9/11?

Point, game, match....


Fascinating!

snicker

FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC. FAA
Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during the intercept. If I am
incorrect about this please post specific FAA Procedures that shows this.

It
shouldn't be that difficult as I've already stated.


And if the government had followed non-existent procedures that
required the scramble of fighters on 9/11, all would have been saved.

Yeah, that's pretty fascinating.


Yes it is when you repeatedly can't seem to produce the specific FAA
Procedure that shows you are correct.

snicker

--
It's obvious to me that the country has rapidly divided itself into two
camps. There are the wimps and apologists who want to continue supporting
those who failed to protect the America Citizens from an attack on such a
grand scale- then there are the real flag bearers who want to hold them
accountable for their failures and finger pointing constituting major
contradictions between themselves resulting in a huge cover up.