"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
In case you did not know, Bush is smart enough to leave the operational
decisions in the hands of the military.

He's in charge.

He's responsible.


Yes, you are right. President Bush is ultimately responsible for the war in
Iraq. And your point is? A reasonable person will understand that mistakes
are going to occur, and make judgements of the President based on his
overall perfomance. For example, Roosevelt was president when hundreds of
thousands of Americans died, quite a few as the result of mistakes, and yet
few consider him a terrrible leader. A reasonable person will understand
that subordinates are also imperfect people (unlike you, no doubt) and react
accordingly. On the other hand, someone with an agenda will not react
reasonable and will make unfair criticisms. I have good reason to believe
the alternative to President Bush is even less perfect in judgement in deed
and in fact. I think the American electorate will reach the same
conclusion.

Jarg