Brooks:

4. If
you can do so with an open mind (doubtful, I am afraid, given your past
track record), you will see that the case can definitely be made that the
external sourced insurgents don't meet the PW criteria, and that activities
of some of the former Iraqi military personnel who have since retaken up
arms puts them outside the purview of Article 4.

Brooks, did you ever post a retraction of your statement that Gen Shinseki was
retired when he said that "several hundred thousand" troops would be required
in Iraq? He was in fact on active duty, you know.

Was that just a big fat lie on your part, or were you honestly mistaken?

In any case, your statement above is wrong:

"Rumsfeld replied that the Geneva Conventions applied to all prisoners held in
Iraq but not to those held in Guantanamo Bay, where detainees captured in the
global war on terror are held."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4855930


But those prisoners in Iraq didn't get the protection of the Geneva Convention,
did they? They were stripped and sleep deprived and humiliated and sodomized
and threatened with attack dogs, weren't they?

This is a horrible national disgrace and you and your co-shill are having a
really hard time not telling telling big fat whopping lies to cover it up.

Walt