FAA Wants To Cancel 736 NDB, VOR/DME Approaches
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
Larry Dighera  writes: 
 
 On Sun, 03 May 2015 17:26:04 -0700, Bug Dout  wrote: 
 
 The cost-saving incentive of NextGen ATC is flawed, aircraft position will 
 become dependent on what the aircraft reports rather than empirical evidence of 
 its position, ATC will be wrest from government control, and in-flight safety 
 will be reduced, but that's okay, because Boeing will make a butt-load of cash 
 in user-fees.  :-( 
 
The big problem with current primary radar and Mode C transponders, as I 
understand, is they're accurate to only within a mile. Not good enough 
to squeeze anticipated future traffic into the same airspace. ADSB is 
not designed to save money over the current Primary+Mode C system. It's 
designed to prevent anticipated future congestion. 
 
I think you're too pessimistic. The FAA is somewhat incompetent for 
sure, but there's no conspiracy or Machivellian scheme for GA user 
fees, grabbing control or giving up all control, etc. 
--  
It's not what you don't know that hurts you. It's what you know that 
just isn't so. 
 ~ Satchel Paige 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |