View Single Post
  #5  
Old May 28th 15, 01:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
pcool
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 69
Default Help us with this petition for security on anti-collision systems

Who is incompatible with who? You have the freedom to choose a device
manufacturer.
The TAdvisor, and probably the OGN devices soon, are not worst than flarm to
do this job.
Anyway, as a wise guy ("Buddy Bob") here stated, shortly we may have OGN
devices acting as collision avoidance systems.
At that point Flarm will change its protocol and adopt the open one.

I fully agree with Bob, it is pointless to ask Flarm to open the protocol.
What we need is several other manufacturers selling their own devices, based
on the OGN open software for example. I have not signed the petition for
this reason.


"Andy Blackburn" wrote in message
...

On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 7:46:25 PM UTC-7, pcool wrote:

The assumption is that the glider in thermal with you, or arriving in
front
of you, has a device with the same protocol.
In the alps this is no more granted. This is what this thread is about.


Wow, why would people buy an incompatible device when there are multiple
manufacturers of compatible devices in the market?