View Single Post
  #6  
Old June 1st 04, 12:14 AM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
The Brits don't have any really great shakes going for them either.

The most famous Brit general of the 20th century -- Montgomery-- was
borderline
incompetent. None of his plans ever worked even remotely as

advertised.
Crap,
he planned the raid of Dieppe.

In fact he was part of the ORIGINAL planning group but that raid
was abandoned and when the project was revived , Montogomery
urged that it be cancelled as standing no hope of success as all
hope of surprise, which was essential to the operation had been lost.

Indeed Lieut.-General H. G. D. Crerar, G.O.C. 1st Canadian Corps,
took the place of Montgomery who thereafter took no part in the

operation
and was in fact in North Africa when the raid took place.

But hey the facts never got in the way of your rants
before so why stop now.

Keith


What was the difference between what Montgomery planned originally amd

what was
executed?


Just about everything and most especially
timing.

Of course Montgomery's incidental connection to the Dieppe raid pales

when
compared to his other failures like not getting his D-Day onbjectives,

failing
to clear the approaches to Antwerp and Market-Garden.


Which pale beside his achievements. Montogomery like Patton
was a prima-donna, a pain in the arse and an excellent
field commander. Like all generals he made mistakes but
got things more right than wrong.


The relationship betwen the two men is beautifully described in Chester
Wilmotts book... what ws it called? The Road to Europe maybe?

John