"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Henry J Cobb" wrote:
Brett wrote:

"Henry J Cobb" wrote:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=5350514
But Christopher Bolkcom, a military aviation analyst at the
nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, said any cutbacks in
planned F-35 purchases would harm confidence in the program by
virtue
of boosting flyway costs per unit.

-HJC


Any reason why you shortchanged the subject line?

"Fewer of the so-called CTOL versions are needed because the Air Force
has
opted to buy significant numbers of the short take-off, vertical
landing
model, or STOVL, said Marvin Sambur, the assistant secretary for
acquisition."

Note that they didn't deny there might be some cutback in the overall
numbers.

With an increase in the numbers of F-35B's purchased which should result
in
a cheaper VTOL version for the Marines and RAF and you still didn't answer
the original question I asked "Any reason why you shortchanged the subject
line?"

Not an unusual practice in Henry's case--a blurb is often taken out of
context, then often expanded upon with his own flights of fancy.

Brooks