View Single Post
  #2  
Old June 18th 04, 02:18 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Kemp" wrote in message
...
On 17 Jun 2004 07:37:18 -0700, (robert arndt) wrote:


http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl.../english/index

..html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

While US troops get blown away in antiquated Hummers the MUNGO is
operational with KSK already with no losses.


Armoured Hummers are proof agaist the same things Mungo is - both are
toast to an RPG - did you actually read the quote page?

"Protection level

The MUNGO defeats NATO 7.62x51 standard ammunition, hand grenades and
has an optional protection kit against AP-Mines."

How would this help against a 155mm shell rigged as an IED, or an RPG,
two very common methods of atack in Iraq?


Stop trying to confuse poor Arndt with facts! Geeze, you expect him to both
*read* and *understand* the various articles he cites as "proof" for his
lunatic rants?

Brooks


Peter Kemp