"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

(Snip)

Now Art shows his lack of credibility. Even the UN admits that Iraq had
loads of WMD.

.....in the '80s.

Nope. 1998. And the chief UN inspector said after the war started that
there was still evidence of ongoing programs prior to the war.

And you still don't know the difference between a program and a weapon. Even
old Muammar Khadafi of Libya, who had pursued an active nuclear weapons program
for many years which he recently gave up in exchange for international
respectability never had anything he could have made go bang. If he had, he'd
have dropped it on Tel Aviv years ago. Lots of countries have programs.....so
what?

To this day, almost a year and a half after our "mission
completed" occurred, and with well over 100,000 American troops in the
country
going back and forth over that miserable dusty country, none of the
weapons we
were supposed to be afraid of has ever been found.

As far as you know.

And as far as the President's personally appointed chief looker, David Kay, and
his entire team of searchers were able to find. If you can't believe the
President's own man, who do you believe?

To accuse Art of suffering from lack of credibility is a perfect example
of the
pot and the kettle.

Really? How is that? Art said they NEVER had any WMD. I replied
(correctly) that they did. Seems to me that you are wrong.

I have no idea what Art said at the beginning of your nit picking snit with him
since I don't normally read his stuff. My statement stands, based upon what I
saw posted....from what I could tell, you were doing exactly what you were
criticizing him for doing and I'm not about to get into defining what time
context "never" is supposed to apply to any more than you'd want to get into a
****ing match over defining what "is" is.

George Z.