"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

(Snip)

Now Art shows his lack of credibility. Even the UN admits that
Iraq
had
loads of WMD.

.....in the '80s.

Nope. 1998. And the chief UN inspector said after the war started
that
there was still evidence of ongoing programs prior to the war.

And you still don't know the difference between a program and a
weapon.

Riiiight. And I suppose Saddam dropped a "program" on the Kurds and
Iranians. Funny, those pictures and medical reports sure looked like
nerve
and mustard gas. Guess them "programs" are dangerous after all.

And when did that happen? March, 1988 during the war against Iran. So,
let's
see, is 1988 in the 80s or the 90s? Oh......

Yes, oh. Lots of the chems were never accounted for after the Gulf War.
And some keeps coming back even today, like in artillery shells used as
IEDs.



To this day, almost a year and a half after our "mission
completed" occurred, and with well over 100,000 American troops in
the
country
going back and forth over that miserable dusty country, none of
the
weapons we
were supposed to be afraid of has ever been found.

As far as you know.

And as far as the President's personally appointed chief looker, David
Kay, and
his entire team of searchers were able to find. If you can't believe
the
President's own man, who do you believe?

Like I said, "as far as you know".

Did you think I didn't hear you the first time?

"hear" me? Umm, this is the internet, not a telephone.

In any event, I repeated it because you already admitted to not reading
everything in the thread. Just thought I'd make sure.

Based on previous posts, its obvious to me that you never read the offical
report from Kay. Perhaps you could look up the part where he said the
Iraqis weren't in compliance with UN resolutions and had programs still
running even after the inspections.


So let me try again......if you
can't believe the President's own man, who do you believe? How about
answering
THAT question, if you don't mind.

I DO believe Mr Kay. Iraq DID have illegal programs in place despite UN
resolutions. Now, why do YOU not believe Mr Kay? It seems your position is
at odds with his now.


To accuse Art of suffering from lack of credibility is a perfect
example
of the
pot and the kettle.

Really? How is that? Art said they NEVER had any WMD. I replied
(correctly) that they did. Seems to me that you are wrong.

I have no idea what Art said at the beginning of your nit picking snit
with him
since I don't normally read his stuff.

Oh, so you only look at one side of the conversation. Thats very
convenient
for you.

My statement stands, based upon what I
saw posted..

Yes, don't read the whole thing. That way when you're proven wrong you
can
deny everything with a BS cover story.

I no longer read what people who I've consigned to my kill file have to
say
except possibly when someone responds to their comments.

Yes, excellent cover when you're caught out.

Like I said, I have no
idea what he said initially in this thread...

Yet you reply anyway and get caught with your head up your ass. Nice.

If you think that's some sort of BS story, then you haven't discovered the
beauties of the kill file, and that'd be your loss.

The BS story is where you try to use the killfile excuse to plead ignorance
when you could easily read the non-killfiled responses or simply remove the
killfile if you really cared about the subject. Like I said, a nice BS
cover story for when you're caught.


..from what I could tell, you were doing exactly what you were
criticizing him for doing and I'm not about to get into defining what
time
context "never" is supposed to apply to any more than you'd want to
get
into a
****ing match over defining what "is" is.

Umm, "never" means exactly that - NEVER. Get a decent dictionary.

Well, if I said that you never said that to me last year, does that mean
"never
from the beginning of time" or does it mean "never during the last year"?
Surely you can see the difference. If it doesn't register on you, then I
might
as well drop it and move on.

Oh, puhlease.