In KcKVc.9881$ni.472@okepread01, on 08/21/2004
at 11:52 AM, "sanjian" said:

wrote:
In Xcxvc.9346$ni.6368@okepread01, on 08/20/2004
at 09:04 PM, "sanjian" said:

wrote:
In llcvc.7979$ni.2899@okepread01, on 08/19/2004
at 09:20 PM, "sanjian" said:

wrote:
Stop your nonsene -- and non sequiturs. bush went to the texas
ANG because that's where he had the political connections to get
in the day he needed to.

And we see reason come to a screeching halt. Pete explains
something to you, and all you can do is dismiss it as nonsense and
repeat your same old diatribe.

He posted nonsense. bush got into the texas guard -- because daddy
had connections in texas.

I hate to tell you this, but "proof by assertion" has no legitimacy
in logical debates. Even repeated insistance that Bush got in by his
connections does not make it so. It seems that you define
"nonsense" as "That which disagrees with me."

Listen up asshole -- no one got in the ANG during the Vietnam war --
on the day they applied -- without political power opening the door
and building the road for them.

Deal with it!

You already posted that. Resorting to spamming now?


See a shrink about your inability to accept truth you don't like.