"Bob McKellar" wrote:
Brett wrote:

"Bob McKellar" wrote:
Brett wrote:

"Bob McKellar" wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote:

snip


Yet another problem is the very clear application of the 527
loophole
by Kerry supporters (can you say "moveon.org"?) then squealing
when
his own ox takes a goring.

moveon.org is not a 527, it predates the legislation, having been
started
during the Clinton impeachment furor.
It is a PAC, with full disclosure of donors.

"moveon.org" operates under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code
26
U.S.C. Section 527.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...tle=26&sec=527

Partially correct:

Which is a change in your previous position where you told Ed Rasimus
that
it was only a PAC. It's "primary operations" since Bush was elected have
been the supported by the bottomless pit "voter fund" sponsors Soros,
Lewis,
Bing..... that group of "three" are also the primary sponsors of several
other questionable 527's, "Joint Victory Campaign", "Media Fund",
"America
Coming Together".....


Yes, I knew that moveon.org was an earlier manifestation, but I had never
been
to their web site until after your clever post quoting the IRS code.

When I went there, I discovered a new activity of moveon.org, which was
indeed a
527, as I stated. I learn new things all the time.

Is it your position that most 527's are left leaning, using the Democrats'
superior finances to battle the impoverished Republicans?

No my position is that what you had originally posted was garbage.