Guy Alcala wrote:
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Pete" wrote in message
. ..
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html
Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo
Right now they are saying that Russian sources report eyewitnesses seeing
the 134 explode in mid-air before coming down.
Coincidence, or...?
If the reports of a mid-air explosion for the 134 are correct, then I'd
imagine that losing two aircraft at about the same time, from the same
departure point, puts things a bit outside the likely coincidence realm.
Agreed, although that's a might big if. The number of a/c which are reported
by eyewitnesses to have exploded/been on fire before crashing but which were
subsequently found not to have been, is rather large. Another possibility,
assuming no explosion, would be a fuel contamination problem at Domededovo.
If the Tu-154 which disappeared had tanks that were more full than the other
before being topped up, that might explain the longer delay before problems
surfaced, depending on the order in which fuel is drawn. OTOH, the lack of
any radio comms from either a/c would be considered highly suspicious with
western a/c -- considering the reported state of Russian civil aviation and
ATC I don't know that we can jump to the same conclusion in this case.
Guy
I would be surprised if it was fuel contamination - Domodedovo is now
Moscow's premier airport and Eastline, the owners, have spent millions
updating it.
I was there last Monday - see :-
http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...004_day03.html
for a ramp tour and the facilities would put many western airports to
shame. It is as modern as they come.
That is not to say that fuel contamination is impossible - just unlikely
IMHO.
I was also surprised when I heard that the two a/c had departed from
Domodedovo - the security we experienced was very tight - and we were an
authorised party with prior permissions, passes etc.
I could have understood it if the flights had begun at Vnukovo, Bykovo
or even Sheremetyevo - but Domodedovo ?
Ken