View Single Post
  #10  
Old April 27th 06, 09:38 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default F-35's Costs Climb Along With Concerns

In article .com,
wrote:

Harry Andreas wrote:
On one side is the old guard: "Defense acquisition experts with the watchdog
Government Accountability Office" who want the aircraft to roll off the
line fully developed. What they want, in the WWII context, is a P-51H coming
off the production line from the get-go.


Humm, I recall seeing a GAO report (link was in this newsgroup some
time ago think) where the point was exactly the opposite. GAO wanted to
have spiral development and cited F-16 as a succesful example of it,
while project management was pressing for a finished product.


Just goes to show that there are factions within USG just as there are
factions everywhere.


The reasons stated were in addition to reducing development risks that
a large number of aircraft in US inventory are getting old, and even a
minor delay in tight F-35 schedule has grave consequences for both
fighter availability and maintenance costs.


And yet the article makes a case for waiting...

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur