View Single Post
  #7  
Old February 20th 09, 02:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default stall recognition and recovery

On Feb 19, 4:43*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:02*pm, Ramy wrote:





On Feb 19, 7:44*am, Andy wrote:


The following references are provided, without my comment, for those
interested in the subject of stall recognition and recovery.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...?mod=djemalert...


reports on the referenced fatal accident:


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...05MA003&rpt=fa


http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2007/AAR0701.pdf


Andy


I simply don't buy it. How any pilot with even basic experience, not
to mention thousands of hours, will react to a stall warning by
pulling on the stick/yoke?? and "pitched up to a 31-degree angle" ??
It's not like they were so close to the ground that they had to pullup
to clear it. As usual, the NTSB rather put the blame on the pilots...


Ramy


What you think the pilots should not be blamed becasue they could not
possibly be so incompetent to conduct the amazing list of bad
decisions and errors that made? That's an interesting defense.

Well if that accident chain does not deserve to be blamed on the
pilots I don't know what does. Lets see, lets climb the sucker to
FL410, with the AP in rate mode so is really slow when we get there,
lets not monitor airspeed during this (even though we know are pushing
the envelope). Lets not follow engine failure checklists properly,
lets not pitch over and correctly do a windmills start, etc. (I can't
recall if it as established how much they knew about core lock if at
all, but they failed to execute basic restart procedure). Lets not
declare our emergency and try to cover up for a while hoping we can
get ourselves out of this hole. Lets not fly the sucker when all else
goes wrong and maintain glide to any of several airports etc. etc.
etc. This flight crew deserved evey bit of cricism they got. Some
aspects of training programs and the core lock on the GE engines etc.
need to be addressed but are very distant factors in my opinion.

And dude if that does ### convince you these folks were an accident
waiting to happen read ### cockpit transcript. Dude.

Most commentators came down hard on the pilots as well, including
several magazine articles.

There are multiple fatal accidents where things as "simple" as
misunderstanding stick shaker/pusher vs. Mach buffeting, obstructed
pitot/static systems (and fighting the stick pusher thinking it was
Mach induced, etc. etc.). However none of those are even close to *the
chain of events this flight crew managed to accomplish.

Darryl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I don't think we are talking about the same accidents Darryl. I was
referring to the recent one in the article. And I don't say pilots
should not be blamed for many possible mistakes they do. All I say is
that I don't buy the claim that experience pilot purposely pulled the
yoke and piched up to 31 degree angle without recognizing he is
stalling the aircraft. Unless I missread the article this is a
complete BS.

Ramy