"Matt Barrow" wrote:



The "peer-reviewed" reports are supposedly running 100% in favor of
HAGW.
Not even evolution gets that high of "consensus".

Well, what does that tell us about the folks who do not agree with the
consensus regarding evolution? Or are they another embattled band of
truth seekers battling the vast wealth and power of the geneticist
empire, the way the What-AGW folks are battling the allpowerful
climatology cartel and their grim desire to destroy the US economy for
murky reasons nobody can fathom?