View Single Post
  #13  
Old May 1st 09, 05:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default "PENTAGON WORKING TO GIVE F-35 JSF NUCLEAR-STRIKE CAPABILITY"

On May 1, 10:08*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Apr 30, 11:07 pm, Ian B MacLure wrote:

Ed Rasimus wrote :

...
And, yet, in the past the list of NATO allies that sat alert with
tactical nuclear weapons on small jets was pretty long:


Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, Turkey, Greece, Italy, W. Germany,
France, UK...


* * * * Kanuckistan. Their 104s had a nuclear strike role before
* * * * "Turdeau" took over.
* * * * IBM


It's a bad idea to give F-35's nuke capability, it's expensive,
unnecessary and useless, in fact worse than useless,
because we are openly working to go non-nuclear weapons.


It's pointless to work with anybody in the pentagon on weapons
issues,
since the only thing any of them even know about weapons is the
The Lockheed Times. So that's why the educable people with actual
post-1942
brains in weapons, science, engineering, and medicine all work on
GPS,
AUVs, Drones, Digital-Terrain Mapping, Laser-Guided Phasors,
Optical Computing,
Microcomputers, C++, Distributed Processing, HDTV debuggers, MP3,
MPEG,
CD+rw, DVD-rom, Holograms, Fiber Optics, Cell Phones, On-Line
Banking,
On-Line Publishing, Self-Assembling Robots, Microwave Cooling,
Biodiesel, Pv Cell Energy, Fiber Optics, Light Sticks, Compact
Flourescent Lighting,
Cruise Missiles, Phalanx, Self-Replicating Machines, and Post GM
wheel bearings.








Ken