Thread: GPS Longevity
View Single Post
  #7  
Old January 17th 08, 04:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Allen[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default GPS Longevity




"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:FdLjj.9199$YW6.6112@trndny07...
"Allen" wrote in message
. ..

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:68Ijj.10440$ac7.7748@trndny03...


I'll probably look around for a lightly used 295. There's a

manufacturing
defect in the Pilot III's that made all of the screens shrink. They
were
perfectly usable ten years ago, now they're all too small


If I were you I would look for a 296. The 295 does not have a built-in
ability to charge the batteries. If you lose the ship's electrical power
you have only the remaining battery life. The 296 will charge the

batteries
while in use; if you lose the ship's power you should still have fully
charged batteries.

I have a 295 and that is the only drawback between the two. I use
ni-cads
and have to remember to charge them between use.


295s are selling for $250 to $500 on Ebay. 296s are $900 to $1100. I can
sneak a $500 purchase by she-who-must-be-obeyed. $1000 would generate
questions.

Keeping a package of Duracells in the plane is a cheap fix.


That's true, I did not realize there was that much difference in price.