"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Happy Dog" wrote:

When you guys are done patting yourselves on the back you might address
my
point that there isn't any good evidence that the ADIZ was created to
reduce
"clutter".

Define "clutter"

From this thread:

I'm talking about radar screen clutter. Yes. I see no other rational
reason for the DC ADIZ.

and (subsequently from the same poster)

My point was that the DC ADIZ's purpose most probably is to protect
the innocent from lethal force.


Comment:

The contention (stated by a few posters here) that the OP is objecting to is
that the ADIZ is unjustified, is unworkable and, thus, is little more than a
political move to satisfy the uneducated, early-weaned emotionally
underdeveloped populace that the government has, once again, taken over
where mom and dad left off. It's a case of Transference, in the Freudian
sense. Excuses are made, for the government, suggesting that this measure
is necessary to protect pilots from themselves, solves an ATC workload
problem etc. That these claims have been shown to lack in merit does
nothing to dissuade the odd person from repeating them or claiming similar
new ones. It's crap.

moo