View Single Post
  #1  
Old May 17th 20, 03:39 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Miloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,291
Default Thirteen sailors aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt test positive for coronavirus for a SECOND time...

....after previously recovering from outbreak aboard the sidelined aircraft
carrier

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cond-time.html

*Thirteen sailors now appear to have become infected a second time while serving
aboard the sidelined aircraft carrier

*All the sailors had previously tested positive for the virus and had gone
through at least two weeks of isolation

*Questions have been raised about the accuracy of tests, and whether patients
who have recovered can get the disease for a second time

*The ship sent more than 4,000 of its 4,800 crew members ashore for quarantine
or isolation in March after a first infection

Eight more sailors aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt have tested positive again
for the coronavirus, raising to 13 the number who appear to have become infected
a second time while serving aboard the sidelined aircraft carrier.

All the sailors had previously tested positive for the virus and had gone
through at least two weeks of isolation. Before they were allowed to go back to
the ship, all had to test negative twice in a row, with the tests separated by
at least a day or two.

On Saturday, a Navy official confirmed eight additional sailors had tested
positive again.

A day earlier the Navy had said in a statement that five had tested positive a
second time. The Navy official was not authorized to speak publicly and
requested anonymity.

That some crew were testing positive again has puzzled officials and raised
questions about reintegrating troops into the military if a second infection
were possible.

Also questioned was the accuracy of testing itself. In some cases infection can
be at such a low level that it is not detected by the test, which could mean
there were no relapses. Also, people could be cleared because their virus levels
were too low for detection.

News of the second potential outbreak comes just two months after about 1,100
crew members on the ship tested positive for the virus. One crew member has
died.

More than 4,000 crew members went ashore last month after the ship was diverted
to Guam.

While more than 2,000 are back on board, at least 1,000 are still testing
positive for the virus and remain on land.

And the close to 700 crew members who had been protecting and running the
Roosevelt and systems aboard have now moved into hotels and other facilities on
the island for their quarantine.

When it’s time to return to the ship, boarding takes place in slow, meticulous
waves. Wearing gloves and masks, the crew members climb onto sterile buses only
after they’ve had two negative tests for the virus.

They are screened and checked when they get on the bus and again before they
board the ship. And even a simple sniffle can get them turned back.

Those who had stayed on the ship did deep cleaning four times a day.

The first outbreak led to the firing of Capt Brett Crozier. He was relieved of
his duties on April 2 after a letter he wrote to superiors urging them to
respond more quickly to the coronavirus outbreak on board the aircraft carrier
leaked to the press at the end of March.

Thomas Modly, who was the acting Navy secretary at the time, flew aboard the
carrier and delivered a profanity-laced speech criticizing both the crew and
Crozier. Within days, Modly resigned.

While questions still loom over whether Crozier will be reinstated as
Roosevelt's captain, he has taken up a temporary staff job with Naval Air Forces
in San Diego, spokesperson Cmdr Ron Flanders confirmed Tuesday.

According to Flanders, Crozier will serve as special assistant to the Naval Air
Forces Chief of Staff, Capt Max McCoy.

Late last month, the Navy revealed that officials will conduct a wider
investigation of circumstances surrounding the spread of the coronavirus aboard
the Roosevelt, a move that delayed the decision on whether to reinstate Crozier.

The investigation was announced by James E. McPherson, the acting Navy
secretary, who said in a brief written statement that an initial inquiry was
insufficient.

'I have unanswered questions that the preliminary inquiry has identified and
that can only be answered by a deeper review,' he said.

The outbreak was the most severe in the US military, which is seeking to balance
a need to protect troops while also maintaining US defenses.

The broader probe is to examine communication and leadership actions in the Navy
chain of command in the Pacific, to include events before the initial virus
outbreak in late March, officials said.

The announcement of the investigation came days after Secretary of Defense Mark
Esper declined to immediately endorse the Navy's original investigation into the
issue, which included a recommendation to reinstate Crozier.



*