wrote in message
...
You're right about "clueless" ... I mean, how much information do you
NEED? I *said* Midland AIR SHOW

Not in your first post you didn't, to which Brien replied. You provided NO
information whatsoever about what it was you were talking about.

Frankly, you're lucky you got a reply at all. Most people, including
myself, when they see a post that appears to be completely random and has no
information that could be used to form a reply, simply ignore the post
altogether. This includes people who actually know the answer to whatever
question you think you're asking, but which you failed to ask.

It's a pretty sure bet that someone so clueless as to "ask" a question
without actually providing any information about what question they are
asking are probably also so clueless as to take offense when someone points
out how clueless their first post was, rather than admitting that they
should have been more specific.

Your response is a perfect case in point. You've quite well demonstrated
why people shouldn't bother to reply to posts as clueless as your first post
was.

Pete