On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:57:21 +0100, Ramsman
wrote:

On 08/10/2013 14:13, Lab Lover wrote:
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:22:04 +0100, Ramsman
wrote:

On 07/10/2013 18:43, Lab Lover wrote:
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:00:39 +0100, Ramsman
wrote:

On 06/10/2013 14:56, Lab Lover wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:15:53 +0100, Syke
wrote:

On 06/10/2013 09:05, Syke wrote:
Is that a 3 blade prop and a 4 blader?
Regards

Syke

Responding to my own question, it seems the answer is, sometimes;

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=co...=lnms&tbm=isch

But not always;

http://www.aircraftaces.com/photos/pby-coronado-1.jpg

How odd!

Some interesting history on the Coronado:

http://www.history.navy.mil/branches...ac/pb2y-5r.pdf


I thought I'd research the Coronado in my own library, so took out my
book on testing at Boscombe Down during WWII. It took a couple of
minutes to work out why the Coronado wasn't in the index...


And....?


I felt foolish.


I only tug once on the cheese.


That sounds rather rude.

Have a look in Google Maps for Boscombe Down, the site of the UK's
Aeroplane & Armament Experimental Establishment, and you'll see what I mean.

There was nothing rude about the comment. I asked for you to elaborate
on your original, incomplete thought and you would not do so, instead
you responded with a feeble attempt at facetiousness.

I spend enough time trying to read my wife's mind due to the female
propensity for expression through the use of incomplete thoughts.

Now, you try and send me on a silly research project just to uncover
the final sentence of your thought? No thanks.