Emergency Exit
At 14:33 30 June 2018, Dan Marotta wrote:
To me the major advantages of a BRS over a personal
parachute are the
speed and certainty of deployment.Â* Of course either
system may fail or
malfunction, but with the BRS, you lose the difficulty of
getting out
into space and deploying at in unfavorable position. Simply
pull the
handle and enjoy the ride.
But, upon landing in a windy situation, you run the very
real risk of
being killed in a tumbling, disintegrating wreck being
dragged along the
ground.Â* Is there a jettison capability that could be armed
by the
sudden deceleration of landing?Â* Perhaps an automatic
jettison?Â* Might
that malfunction at 500' and give you a last thrilling ride?
On 6/29/2018 10:49 PM, Charlie Quebec wrote:
Beacause floating around out of control under a
parachute is safer?
BRS sounds good, but in practice I would prefer a
personal chute every
time.
--
Dan, 5J
Of course you could be struck by lightening as you descend
under your BRS canopy but has anyone ever died being
"dragged along the ground" after a successful BRS escape?
Plenty have died following a conventional parachute mal-
function.
The bottom line is that BRS will work at a lower height but is
hardly available in any common sailplane on sale today.
Retro fitting a BRS to an EASA sailplane would be a
expensive, possibly impossible, task. With ultra-light
sailplanes it's different.
The other major problem, as clearly explained on DG's
website, is that "safety does not sell sailplanes". The
majority of DG sailplanes sold were NOT equipped with the
NOAH system: the new buyers simply did not order the
NOAH system. Even if BRS was available today how many
buyers would buy it?
Dave W
|