On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:20:29 -0500, Peter Clark
wrote:

Way for the FAQ from 7/05 and the Chief Council to say different
things on the exact same question!

Chief Counsel trumps FAQ's.

But the Chief Counsel opinion seems to advise a complete description as to
the nature of the conditions, rather than just logging "actual"


"The log should include the reasons for determining that
the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot
later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight
time logged was legitimate."


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)