View Single Post
  #13  
Old August 11th 05, 03:25 AM
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
"JJ Sinclair" wrote:

You really don't want to argue that the pilot wasn't operating his
aircraft below 500 feet (not in the act of landing) and that he wasn't
within 500 feet of a person, do you?


I really don't think you could argue that a touch-and-go or missed
approach to a runway or airfield in active use means that you are "not
in the act of landing".

--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O----------