View Single Post
  #15  
Old June 26th 08, 08:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
E Z Peaces
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default bouncing off the runway

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
E Z Peaces wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
More_Flaps wrote in
news:0390ffd1-a85e-4ae3-8971-
:

On Jun 26, 3:00 pm, E Z Peaces wrote:

The man said the problem was that he had failed to keep the stick
back after touchdown. Does his recollection make sense?
Nope


Does actually. Little tailfraggers, and big ones, come to think of
it, bounce along of you dont get the stick back after three pointing.
the mains will thrust it back up into the air a bit and then the nose
comes back down again repeating the cycle.



Bertie

Doesn't a three-point landing occur at stall speed?



Not always.


Isn't the plane
going too slowly to lift off again? Besides, if the tail is that low,
touching down won't increase the angle of attack, will it?


If the tail is that low, you have th estick all the way back.


The man said it was after touchdown that he'd quit holding the stick back.

You say the mains will thrust it back up into the air and the cycle
will repeat. In a three-point landing, it seems it would take springs
to make a plane rise. Aren't shock absorbers supposed to prevent
that?



Shock absorbers are for cars and they'r emade to dampen cycles such as
that.




Bertie


I've read about oleo aircraft struts at least as early as the 1920s.

Sorry about my multiple posts this morning. Each time I sent it, my
newsreader said the news server had not responded, so I'd try again.