View Single Post
  #5  
Old May 9th 08, 11:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Dean A. Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default The Swedish Model: How to build a jet fighter.

Ed Rasimus wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Douglas Eagleson
wrote:

This is a true canard design and as such it has a fundamental
superiority built in. As a canard is rolled inverted it has a basic
stall capacity to recover the failed descent.


You mean that you can exceed 90 degrees of bank and roll all the way
inverted without the lifties falling off the wing? How does it know
it's inverted?
A roll to a dive is a safe and highly envelope extending ability over
the USA jets.


You mean USA jets can't roll into a dive?
It can literally out speed all USA jets as it goes to the deck.


Speed is speed. Up, down or level.
And in dogfights where unknown missles are the issue, the deck is
where the safe place is. A good pilot could shred the YF-22 in this
maneuver.


And what will happen when someone invents a doppler radar that doesn't
see ground clutter?

Did you get this stuff out of a comic book?

Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
"Palace Cobra"
www.thunderchief.org

Well Ed, I was half expecting a blonde babe from the posting title.

Dean