View Single Post
  #28  
Old July 25th 03, 09:40 AM
Jim Watt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:07:50 -0700, "TinCanMan"
wrote:


"Jim Watt" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:25:37 -0700, "TinCanMan"
wrote:

They are not, therefore they have no rights as POW's


In the UN declaration of Human rights, which the US
purports to support it says:

Article 9
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

You can find the rest at
http://www.gibnet.com/texts/udhr.htm


--
Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com


Oh, my! Perhaps in your zeal to find some justification, any justification
for your belief, you've skipped over the operative word. That word is
arbitrary. Did you miss that or did that part not suit your preconceived
agenda? You see, they are detained within the laws of war and are detained
in accordance with the Geneva Conventions. The reason is because they are
combatants or supported combatants. Nothing arbitrary about it at all. Very
objective. Get caught under arms, get locked up for the duration.


Duration of what? the Bush dynasty?

There is nothing in the UDHR that says it only applies to civilians
and there is no war in progress.
--
Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com