"Steve Richter" wrote in message
om...
"Naidoo" wrote in message
...
Yes, it's so surprising that people (the Israelis) hate those (the
Palestinians) who try to kill and often succeed in killing them (the
Israelis) randomly in cafes and public transit.

What a ****ing surprise!

I have no pity for the Palestinians. They have created the misery they
live
in, so **** 'em.

That is not true. They never asked to be occupied in 67 and the
guerrilla attacks launched on Israel before the occupation were so few
that the occupation was never justified.

Of course they didn't "ask" to be "occupied" as you call it. They started a
****ing war and the Israelis won. The Palestinians lost land, what a
shocker.


Do you favor the US continuing to send billions every year to Israel,
money that effectively pays for the occupation? Esp when the price
for the US supporting the occupation is 9/11 type attacks?


The US sends money to the Palestinians also. However, unlike their
neighbors, the US doesn't give money to the homicide bomber's families.
Regardless, I think the US shouldn't send money to either party. The money
sent to the Palestinians (from everybody, I might add) seems to always end
up in Ara****s pockets to keep his wife and kids safely tucked away in
France and grow his personal wealth. (What a shocker that a terrorist's
family lives in France, of all places). And the money sent to Israel, seems
to build their military. I disagree with both outcomes.

In the end, choking both off might hasten a resolution of some sort. In the
end, it would be wise for both parties to come to some peaceful resolution,
before the rest of the world gets sick of the whole situation and does
something more drastic than either party wants.

XN