On Wed, 11 May 2005 16:16:42 GMT, wrote:

On 11 May 2005 12:02:49 -0400, (Roy Smith) wrote:

91.169(b). It's a little confusing, since it's worded as an
exception. If your destination does not have an SIAP, it doesn't meet
the requirements of the exception clause.


What's confusing about it?

It simply says that if there is no published IAP AND (min weather
requirements), that you must file an alternate.


You must meet both conditions (published approach AND weather mins)
in order to to be excluded from the requirement for an alternate.


Bad wording in paragraph 2. AND should be OR.

Maybe it's confusling after all.