View Single Post
  #4  
Old March 5th 10, 06:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Ray O'Hara[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default "Vanishing American Air Superiority"


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:10:15 -0500, "Ray O'Hara"
wrote:


"Mike" wrote in message
...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...r_superio.html

Vanishing American Air Superiority


what a load of ****.


That's a difficult argument to refute. Penetrating analysis at its
finest.

What parts? Spit/Hurricane? Sabre/Thunderjet? Century series? Boyd and
hi/lo mix?

You've given us so much to think about Ray.



what better planes being planned never mind actually being built by anybody
else.

the points the author makes are false strawman types.

the Brits on 1940 didn't need two types, they needed more spits, they were
building them.

maybe you can say we have "hurricanes" now but who is building 109s?
if there were no 109s then the Hurricane would have ruled the sky.

technology is moving past the manned fighter. building the most advanced
manned fighter now would be akin to building the most advanced bi-plane in
1935.

what we have is better now than what others have now, building a hugely
expensive "better" plane that will be obsolete in short order is a waste