wrote:
On Nov 20, 6:55Â*pm, wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
terry writes:

Saw Â*a similar comment from a heavy captain on aus.aviation. Â*So why
would they even bother to ask if there was a pilot on board and scare
the **** out of the pax for no reason.

The pilot may have felt that someone else with piloting experience would be
better at providing assistance than someone with none. Â*However, in this type
of situation, that isn't necessarily so. Â*While a trained pilot would almost
certainly not be worse, he might not be better, either. Â*You need someone who
can follow instructions, not necessarily someone who knows how to fly. Â*A
pilot might understand the instructions more easily at first, but he might
also be less inclined to do exactly as he is told, which could present a
hazard that outweighs the utility of his piloting experience.

Your total lack of knowledge of piloting physical aircraft leads you
to a delusional conclusion.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Accident reports involving poor cockpit management don't agree with
you. And a personal slam doesn't constitute a well considered
rebuttal either. I for one would like to know why you think his
response was delusional and without bringing up "sims".

Start with "You need someone who can follow instructions,".

You do realize what this thread is about, and it isn't CRM?

If his post made any sense at all, the copilot would ALWAYS be someone
who knew nothing about piloting, which is a rediculous conclusion.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.